Budi WidhiyantoIn the fast-paced world of software development, version control tools like Git have become essential for keeping projects organized and collaborative. As developers, we often work in parallel, creating branches for new features, fixing bugs, and making updates. But when it’s time to bring those changes back into the main codebase, pull requests (PRs) are the bridge between isolated development and team collaboration.
We’ve all faced the frustration of a PR getting rejected or sent back for revisions. It’s easy to spend hours on a feature, only to realize our implementation doesn’t align with the team’s vision. Over time, however, we learn that effective PRs aren’t just about the code itself. They’re about how we communicate our changes.
In this article, we’ll walk through how to craft pull requests that make the review process smoother, faster, and more efficient for everyone involved.
Crafting the Perfect Pull Request
1. Start with an Informative Title
First impressions matter, even in the world of code. The title of our pull request is our chance to immediately convey the essence of the change. Think of it as the headline of an article; it should be short, clear, and informative. Avoid titles like:
- "Updated code"
- "Fixed bug"
- "Changes from yesterday"
Instead, use more descriptive titles, such as:
feat: Add OAuth2 authentication for API endpointsfix: Resolve race condition in user session handlingrefactor: Optimize database query performance in user search
A well-crafted title helps our reviewers understand the change without opening the PR. It sets the tone for the whole review process.
2. Set the Context (Don’t Assume Everyone Knows the Problem)
Before diving into code, it’s important to provide context. Not everyone may be familiar with the specific problem we’re solving, and it’s essential to explain the why behind the changes. A solid PR description makes the review easier and faster. Here’s a template for a well-structured PR description:
## Problem
The current user authentication system doesn't support social login, causing friction during user onboarding. We're seeing a 40% drop-off rate at the registration step.
Related ticket: AUTH-123
## Solution
Implemented OAuth2 authentication flow with Google:
- Added OAuth2 middleware for handling Google authentication
- Created new user profile mapping logic
- Implemented session management for social login
## Technical Details
- Uses passport-google-oauth20 for authentication
- Added new database fields: googleId, socialProfile
- Modified user model to support multiple auth methods
## Testing
1. Click "Login with Google" button
2. Authorize test application
3. Verify successful redirect to dashboard
4. Check user profile contains Google data
## Configuration
New environment variables required:
- GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID
- GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET
- OAUTH_CALLBACK_URL
This structure ensures that our reviewers understand the issue, the approach we’ve taken, and how to validate the solution. A PR without context can slow things down significantly, so always make sure to include enough information for our team to understand our changes.
3. Keep the PR Focused
We’ve all been there: tempted to tackle multiple issues in one pull request. But this often leads to oversized PRs that can overwhelm reviewers. Instead, we should try to break our work into smaller, more focused PRs. Each PR should address a specific task. For example, if we’re building a user management system, we can break it down into smaller tasks like:
- First PR:
feat: Add basic user model and migration - Second PR:
feat: Implement user authentication endpoints - Third PR:
feat: Add user profile management UI - Fourth PR:
feat: Integrate email verification system
Each PR should focus on a single feature or bug fix, which makes the review process easier for everyone. This leads to faster reviews and fewer reworks.
4. Commit Messages: Keep It Clean
A good commit message does more than explain the code. It helps everyone understand why the change was made and how it fits into the bigger picture.
Why Commit Messages Matter:
- They provide context: A well-written commit message explains the why behind a change.
- They improve collaboration: Future developers can trace the history of the project and easily understand the purpose of each commit.
- They save time: Clear commit messages reduce the need for follow-up questions and prevent back-and-forth during the review process.
Examples of Poor Commit Messages:
"Fixed stuff"
Why it’s bad: This is vague and doesn’t specify what was fixed or why. Did we fix a bug, improve performance, or refactor code? It’s unclear.
Better version:fix(auth): resolve user login bug caused by expired tokens"Updated files"
Why it’s bad: This message doesn’t tell the reviewer what was changed or why the update was necessary.
Better version:chore: update dependencies to fix security vulnerabilities"Work in progress"
Why it’s bad: This doesn’t describe any meaningful change and suggests the code is incomplete. It also makes the review process harder, as the reviewer doesn’t know if they’re looking at a finished feature or just a draft.
Better version:feat(api): add user authentication endpoints
5. Review-Readiness Checklist: Why It’s Crucial
Before submitting a PR, we should use a review-readiness checklist to ensure our code is in top shape. Here’s why having a checklist is important:
- Saves reviewers’ time: It minimizes the chances of reviewers asking for basic fixes, allowing them to focus on the logic of the code.
- Improves consistency: A checklist ensures that all pull requests meet the same standard, making the review process smoother for everyone.
- Reduces back-and-forth: By double-checking our code and tests, we avoid multiple rounds of revisions.
Example checklist:
## Pre-Submission Checklist:
- [ ] Code follows project style guide
- [ ] All tests pass (`npm run test`)
- [ ] Lint checks pass (`npm run lint`)
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] No sensitive data in commits
- [ ] Branch is up to date with `main`
Overcoming Common Pull Request Challenges
Challenge 1: Pull Requests with Too Many Changes
We’ve faced the temptation to submit a massive PR that includes multiple features. However, this often leads to confusion and long review times. Here’s how we solved it: Instead of trying to work on everything at once, we broke the task into smaller, more manageable PRs. First for the database schema changes, then for API modifications, followed by frontend adjustments. This made it easier for reviewers to focus on one thing at a time.
Lesson Learned: Keep the PRs focused on a single aspect of the project.
Challenge 2: Lack of Context in PR Descriptions
Early in my career, I submitted PRs with minimal descriptions, assuming everyone knew what was happening. This led to confusion, questions, and delays in the review process. To fix this, I started adding detailed descriptions for each PR, explaining what the change was, why it was necessary, and how to test it. It made the review process much faster and more efficient.
Lesson Learned: Always provide context in our PR descriptions. Clear explanations can save us time and reduce the need for back-and-forth.
Challenge 3: Inconsistent Commit Messages
Our team once struggled with inconsistent commit messages, which made it difficult to track changes. Some messages were too vague, while others were overly detailed. To resolve this, we created a standardized commit message format (e.g., feat:, fix:, chore:) and made sure everyone followed it. This made the project history much more readable and improved collaboration.
Lesson Learned: Use a consistent commit message format. It helps everyone understand changes quickly.
Conclusion: Pull Requests as a Collaborative Opportunity
Crafting effective pull requests is a skill that improves with practice. By following these guidelines, we can make the review process more efficient while maintaining a cleaner, more maintainable codebase. Each PR is a learning opportunity. Every review comment, suggestion, or question helps us grow as developers and improve our coding practices.
The goal isn’t just to get our code merged; it’s to build a high-quality codebase that’s easy for everyone to understand and maintain. By putting extra care into our PRs, we’re investing in the success of our project and our growth as developers.
Read More :
