Amazon Aurora vs. Amazon RDS

Gurudev Prasad Teketi - Feb 28 - - Dev Community

Difference between Amazon Aurora and Amazon RDS

  • Amazon Aurora: A fully managed relational database service designed for high performance and scalability. It is compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL but offers better performance, availability, and fault tolerance.

  • Amazon RDS (Relational Database Service): A managed database service that supports multiple database engines (MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Oracle, SQL Server, and Amazon Aurora) with automated maintenance, backups, and scaling.

Key Differences

1. Performance

Aurora: Offers up to **5x MySQL performance and 3x PostgreSQL **performance due to optimized architecture.

RDS: Provides native performance of the chosen engine (e.g., MySQL, PostgreSQL, etc.) without enhancements.

2. Storage & Scaling

Aurora:Auto-scales storage from 10GB up to 128TB per database instance.
Supports 15 read replicas with sub-10ms replication lag.

RDS:Manual storage scaling up to 64TB (varies by engine).
Supports 5 read replicas with higher replication lag.

3. High Availability & Failover

Aurora:Replicates data across 6 copies in 3 Availability Zones (AZs).
Automated failover in ~30 seconds.

RDS:Uses Single-AZ or Multi-AZ deployment (2 copies in 2 AZs).
Failover time is 60-120 seconds.

4. Replication

Aurora:15 read replicas with fast replication.
Supports cross-region replication.

RDS:5 read replicas with slower replication.
Cross-region replication only for MySQL and PostgreSQL.

5. Pricing & Cost Efficiency

Aurora:More expensive than RDS due to enhanced features.
Pay-as-you-go model with storage auto-scaling.

RDS:Cheaper for small-to-medium workloads.Fixed storage allocation, requiring manual scaling.

6. Backup & Restore

Aurora: Continuous, incremental backups to S3, with point-in-time recovery.

RDS: Daily snapshots and transaction logs for point-in-time recovery.

7. Use Case Suitability

Aurora: Best for high-performance, high-availability applications that require scalability and fast replication.

RDS: Suitable for standard workloads that don’t require Aurora’s high throughput or storage flexibility.

Image description

. . . . . . . . . . . .