Complete resection of the tumour is recommended for treatment. Long-time follow-up is necessary due to recurrence potential of the tumour even many years after complete surgical resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study follows the regulation of the Institutional Review Board for human research at Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital. Written informed consents were obtained from the patients who participated in this study.BACKGROUND Ocular motor dysfunction is one of the most common postoperative complications of petroclival meningioma. However, its incidence, recovery rate, and independent risk factors remain poorly explored. METHODS A prospective analysis of 31 petroclival meningiomas was performed. Operative approaches were selected by utilizing a new 6-region classification of petroclival meningiomas we proposed. Two scores were used to evaluate the functions of the oculomotor and abducens nerves. Pearson correlation analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were used to identify independent risk factors for intraoperative oculomotor and abducens nerve injury. RESULTS Postoperative new-onset dysfunctions in the pupillary light reflex and eye/eyelid movements as well as abducens paralysis were detected in eight (25.8%), ten (32.3%) and twelve (38.7%) cases, respectively. Their corresponding recovery rates after 6 months of follow-up were 75% (6/8), 80% (8/10), and 83.3% (10/12), respectively, and their mean times to start recovery were 4.03, 2.43, and 2.5 months, respectively. Tumor invasion into the suprasellar region/sphenoid sinus was the only risk factor for dysfunctions in both the pupillary light reflex (p = 0.001) and eye/eyelid movements (p = 0.002). Intraoperative utilization of the infratrigeminal interspace was the only risk factor for dysfunction in eyeball abduction movement (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Dysfunctions of the oculomotor and abducens nerves recovered within 6 months postoperatively. Tumor extension into the suprasellar region/sphenoid sinus was the only risk factor for oculomotor nerve paralysis. Eye/eyelid movements were more sensitive than the pupillary light reflex in reflecting nerve dysfunctions. Intraoperative utilization of the infratrigeminal interspace was the only risk factor for abducens nerve paralysis.BACKGROUND Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are a unique measure of experience of patients which can help address the quality of care of the patients. OBJECTIVE Our aim of the study is to collect quality of care outcomes with our newly navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation patient-reported experience measure (nTMS-PREMs) questionnaire among neurosurgical patients undergoing nTMS. METHODS A single-centre prospective nTMS-PREMs 19-item questionnaire study was performed between February 2018 and December 2018 on patient referred for nTMS at our hospital. The Data was analysed using Likert scale, linear and logistic regression using statistical software (STATA 13.0®). RESULTS Fifty patient questionnaires were collected (30 males, 20 females, mean age of 47.6 ± 2.1 years) among which 74% of patients underwent both motor and language mapping with a mean duration of 103.3 ± 5.1 min. An overall positive response was noted from the results of the questionnaire, tiredness and anxiety being the common effects noted. Patients with the left-sided disease appreciated more the conditions provided in our laboratory (Q4, p = 0.040) and increasing age was related to less confidence and trust (Q6, p = 0.038) in the staff performing the exam. Younger patients tolerated nTMS better than older patients (> 65 years). PubMed literature search resulted in no relevant articles on the use of PREMs in nTMS patients. CONCLUSION nTMS is a well-tolerated non-invasive tool and nTMS-PREMS provides a promising role in identifying the unmet needs of the patients and improving the quality of their care.INTRODUCTION Parathyroid venous sampling (PVS) has been reported to be a useful adjunctive test in localizing lesions in elusive cases of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Conventional cutoff (twofold) is now widely being used, but optimal cutoff threshold for PVS gradient based on discriminatory performance remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS Among a total of 197 consecutive patients (mean age 58.2 years, female 74.6%) with PHPT who underwent parathyroidectomy at a tertiary center between 2012 and 2018, we retrospectively analyzed 59 subjects who underwent PVS for persistent or recurrent disease after previous parathyroidectomy, or for equivocal or negative results from conventional imaging modalities including ultrasonography (US) and Tc99m-Sestamibi SPECT-CT (MIBI). True parathyroid lesions were confirmed by combination of surgical, pathological findings, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) changes. selleck compound Optimal PVS cutoff were determined by receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis with Youden and Liu method. RESULTS Compared to subjects who did not require PVS, PVS group tends to have lower PTH (119.8 pg/mL vs 133.7 pg/mL, p = 0.075). A total of 79 culprit parathyroid lesions (left 40; right 39) from 59 patients (left 24; right 26; bilateral 9) were confirmed by surgery. The optimal cutoff for PVS gradient was estimated as 1.5-fold gradient (1.5 ×) with sensitivity of 61.8% and specificity of 84%. When 1.5 × cutoff was applied, PVS improved the discrimination for true parathyroid lesions substantially based on area under ROC (0.892 to 0.942, p  less then  0.001) when added to US and MIBI. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that PVS with cutoff threshold 1.5 × can provide useful complementary information for pre-operative localization in selected cases.INTRODUCTION The treatment of severe acetabular bone loss remains a difficult challenge. No classification system is available that combines intuitive use, structured design and offers a therapeutic recommendation according to the current literature and modern state of the art treatment options. The goal of this study is to introduce an intuitive, reproducible and reliable guideline for the evaluation and treatment of acetabular defects. METHODS The proposed Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and supporting structures. It consists of 4 main types of defects ascending in severity and subdivisions narrowing down-defect location. Type 1 presents an intact acetabular rim, type 2 includes a noncontained defect of the acetabular rim ≤ 10 mm, in type 3 the rim defect exceeds 10 mm and type 4 includes different kinds of pelvic discontinuity. A collective of 207 preoperative radiographs were graded according to ADC and correlated with intraoperative findings. Additionally, a randomized sample of 80 patients was graded according to ADC by 5 observers to account for inter- and intra-rater reliability.selleck compound