There are several options when it comes to containerized application orchestration and management. Two of the most popular are Kubernetes namespaces and virtual clusters. But which is better for your use case? In this blog, we’ll be comparing the differences and similarities between these two solutions so you can make the best decision for your project. Read on to learn more, and click below to learn how Signadot can help you develop and test your microservices more easily and cost-effectively.

What are Virtual Clusters?

Virtual clusters can be a powerful tool in container orchestration and management. A virtual cluster allows you to isolate resources in a Kubernetes cluster, allowing you additional separation and control beyond the level namespaces allow you.

Using virtual clusters, you can create multiple logical clusters grouped together and set their own resources and configurations. This is great when you need separate environments for different teams or projects that need to run on the same underlying infrastructure.

Virtual clusters can isolate workloads at the cluster level, so there is no risk of interference when you have other independent clusters running on your infrastructure. This also allows you to allocate your resources based on usage priorities more easily. Virtual clusters are also highly scalable, allowing you to add more clusters easily. It also simplifies administration since you can test new features and perform upgrades without affecting your entire cluster.

Of course, they’re not without their drawbacks. Virtual clusters can be complex to manage when you have numerous clusters for a large, complex project. This can also reduce overhead efficiency.

What are Kubernetes Namespaces?

Kubernetes namespaces are another solution for container orchestration and management. Namespaces also allow developers to isolate resources within a Kubernetes cluster, albeit at the application level rather than the more granular cluster level.

Namespaces allow you to organize clusters into virtual sub-clusters which provides easy resource-sharing and simplified management overall. Logical separation between applications allows teams to have their own isolated environment and lets them work without having to worry about interference or resource contention.

Namespaces also allow role-based access controls, which gives you more control over the access different users have to resources within a namespace. Namespaces also tend to be more simplistic than virtual clusters, allowing for minimal configuration.

However, the level of isolation that namespaces allow is limited compared to virtual clusters. If you need a more fine-tuned, granular level of isolation, namespaces may not suffice for your needs.

How Are They Similar?

Kubernetes namespaces and virtual clusters are quite similar, as they serve similar purposes in container orchestration and management. Here are some of the features that both solutions share:

• Isolation in a Kubernetes cluster — Both virtual clusters and namespaces allow developers to partition resources within a Kubernetes cluster. This allows you to create separate environments for teams, projects and applications.
• Resource allocation — Both solutions allow you to define resource quotas and limits. This ensures resources are being used efficiently. The isolated environments also ensure there is no resource cannibalization or contention between teams.
• Security — Namespaces allow you to assign role-based access controls to ensure the right users can access resources. Virtual clusters can have independent clusters running on the same infrastructure, making it safer from unauthorized access.
• Simplified management — Both solutions are easy to implement and make management simpler. Since both solutions allow you to apply updates and configurations independently, it’s easier to test features, make upgrades, roll back changes and more without disruption.

Kubernetes support — Of course, both solutions are supported within the Kubernetes ecosystem. They are well-tested, have community support and there is extensive documentation. Any developer using Kubernetes can typically find the information they need about namespaces or virtual clusters to implement them and use them efficiently.

How are They Different?

Now that we've explored the similarities between Kubernetes namespaces and virtual clusters, let's take a look at the differences.

• Level of isolation — The key difference between Kubernetes namespaces and virtual clusters is the level of isolation they offer. Namespaces isolate workloads at the application level, which is handy for creating separate environments within a physical cluster. Virtual clusters take isolation even further by isolating at the cluster level, meaning you can have independent clusters running on the same underlying infrastructure without interfering with each other.
• Resource allocation capabilities — While both solutions do allow you to set resource quotes and limits, the more granular nature of virtual clusters gives you a more fine-tuned control for resource allocation. This means there is a higher risk of resource contention when using namespaces, but this finer degree of control does come at the cost of being more complex to manage.

Complexity — While namespaces may not isolate at a deeper level beyond the application level, it does make them easier to create and manage, with minimal configuration. Virtual clusters can sometimes be more complex to manage and require additional monitoring comparatively.

Where Signadot Comes In

If you’re looking for the best way to create and test your microservices, Signadot is here to help. While most developer environment platforms in Kubernetes make full copies of your environment, Signadot doesn’t make full clones or copies. Instead, you can use Signadot to create multiple sandboxes in one environment, allowing you to spin up lightweight developer environments in your staging cluster within seconds.

Sandboxes allow you to easily develop and test your most recent dependencies that exist in a remote Kubernetes environment. Not only do these sandboxes save you time and money, but they also increase developer productivity. In short, you can ship microservices more effectively and efficiently.

Get Started for Free Today!

Ready to learn more about Signadot and how our sandboxes can help you ship your microservices faster? Find out how to scale pre-merge testing with microservices and try our Kubernetes native platform for free today!

Originally posted on Signadot's blog.