A Checklist for User Acceptance Testing Best Practices

alishahenderson - May 2 - - Dev Community

To ensure that a successful User acceptance test is conducted by the team, UAT best practices are taken into consideration and applied tactically. Some of the key aspects that can be covered in the UAT checklist are bug prioritization, progress monitoring, test environment preparation, tester scheduling, test case alignment with design requirements.

The checklist provides a roadmap to the testing team and lets them know where they stand currently and how they need to proceed further. Hence, a UAT checklist proves to be a crucial parameter in the UAT process. In this article, you will get to know about user acceptance testing best practices.

Following is a checklist for User Acceptance Testing (UAT) best practices:

1.The target audience needs to be identified: The target audience needs to be properly identified and known in-depth so that the needs and problems can be properly understood. Actual and potential users need to be selected for UAT. User feedback that is obtained from users is also enriching as it allows them to create future improvements and see the errors.

The information that is received in terms of feedback must be specific and clear so that optimum results can be generated. A user acceptance testing checklist is used so that the data can be properly organized during the process.

2.A test plan needs to be developed:The test plan can be seen as the guide or instruction manual for the testing efforts. The objectives of testing (what you are planning to validate and verify) and the scope of testing (what will be tested and what will not be tested) need to be described, based on the detailed schedule of the activities that need to be performed.

Proper credentials for users need to be generated and the test cases needs to be pretested to check whether they work well and whether they also make sense or not. The date and time should be scheduled for execution if the tests are being done remotely.

3.Detailed test cases need to be developed: A test case specifies the expected results, work procedure and the conditions that a tester needs for the purpose of verifying. A methodical plan of action is required. If the tests are performed in person. The guide need to be printed, so that the process can be made easier for them. Well-defined test cases need to be created so that the process has clarity.

Clearly specify in terms of which button needs to be clicked and the specific results that need to be expected. Negative test cases should also be included to determine what will happen in case something unexpected is done by the user.

4.Bug communication standards need to be created: The team should be able to know how to respond when an error appears. When a bug has been reported, the recording of the specific

information should be done, so that later, the problem can be easily recreated and solved accordingly. User acceptance testing should be carried out strategically.

5.The necessity of a well-defined acceptance criteria: Once the product has been developed, the application of a well-defined acceptance criteria comes into perspective, as it helps in ascertaining the approval of a product. When it comes to acceptance criteria, the following are a few key points that need to be pondered and worked upon:

· The acceptance criteria should be able to be tested

· Everyone should be able to easily understand the acceptance criteria

· The acceptance criteria should be simple and clear

· A user perspective should be provided by the acceptance criteria.

Conclusion: If you are looking forward to implementing user acceptance testing for your specific software development project, then do get connected with a leading software testing services company that will provide you a strategic roadmap in line with your project requirements.

About the author: I am a technical content writer focused on writing technology specific articles. I strive to provide well-researched information on the leading market savvy technologies.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .