Command Query Responsibility Segregation Model

Anh Trần Tuấn - Aug 16 - - Dev Community

1. Introduction

CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) is a software design pattern that separates the responsibilities of reading data (queries) and modifying data (commands). By isolating these two concerns, CQRS can improve system performance, scalability, and maintainability. This separation often leads to optimizations that can be made independently for each part.

CQRS divides an application into two primary parts:

Commands : These handle write operations to the system. Commands typically modify the state of the system and do not return data. They simply perform actions such as creating, updating, or deleting information. For example, a "CreateOrder" command would add a new order to the system.

Queries : These handle read operations from the system. Queries only read data and do not alter the system's state. A "GetCustomerOrders" query would retrieve a list of orders for a specific customer.

Image

his separation allows you to optimize these two parts independently, as data writing and reading operations often have different requirements and priorities.

2. How is CQRS implemented

To effectively implement Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS), you need to establish key components such as Commands, Command Handlers, Queries, Query Handlers, and make decisions about the database and data storage.

2.1 Command

Commands are objects that represent actions to write or modify data in a system. Each Command typically contains the necessary data to perform a specific action, such as the information required to add, update, or delete an object.

Examples: CreateUserCommand, UpdateOrderCommand, DeleteProductCommand.

Command Design: Commands should be designed to be simple and contain only the necessary data to perform the operation. Avoid putting business logic into the Command. Instead, clearly specify the required attributes and state.

2.2 Command Handlers

Command Handlers are components responsible for processing Commands. They receive a command, perform necessary validations and operations, and finally apply changes to the Write Model.

Examples: CreateUserCommandHandler, UpdateOrderCommandHandler.

Command Handler Design: A Command Handler receives a Command and performs the following steps:

Data Validation : Verifies the validity of the data within the Command.

Business Logic Execution : Executes business processes such as permission checks, business logic processing.

Data Modification : Updates the Write Model with new or modified data.

2.3 Queries

Queries are objects that represent requests to read data from a system. A Query contains the necessary information to specify the data you want to retrieve.

Examples: GetUserByIdQuery, ListOrdersQuery, FindProductsByCategoryQuery.

Design: Queries are typically very simple and only contain the necessary parameters to execute the query, without containing complex processing logic.

Explanation: A Query is like a question you ask the system. It's a specific request for data. For instance, "GetUserByIdQuery" is asking for the user information based on a given user ID. The design keeps Queries simple to make them easy to understand and reuse.

2.4 Query Handlers

Query Handlers process Queries. They receive a Query, perform read operations on the Read Model, and return the result.

Examples: GetUserByIdQueryHandler, ListOrdersQueryHandler.

Design: A Query Handler typically follows these steps:

Receive Query: Receives and decodes the Query.

Retrieve Data: Executes the query on the Read Model.

Return Result: Returns the query result to the caller.

Explanation: A Query Handler is like the answer to your question. It takes the Query, finds the data in the system (the Read Model), and gives you the result. The Read Model is a simplified view of the data, optimized for reading.

2.5 Event Sourcing

Event Sourcing is a method of storing all state changes as a sequence of events instead of storing the current state. Every change in the system is recorded as an event, and the current state of the system can be reconstructed by replaying these events from the beginning.

Benefits:

Complete History : Provides the ability to review the entire history of state changes of an object.

State Reconstruction : The current state can be recreated from the events, making it easier to recover data in case of failures.

Implementation:

Event Recording : Each write operation (insert, update, delete) is recorded as an event.

State Reconstruction : Use the events to recreate the current state of the object. This can be done on a Write Model or a Read Model depending on the system design.

Event Management : Ensure that events are processed and stored efficiently. Event management systems or services can be used to support this.

3. Various dimensions

3.1 Advantages of CQRS

Clear separation of writes and reads:

Optimized performance : By separating write and read operations, you can optimize the database or data model for each type of operation, improving overall performance.

Independent management : Components of the system can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently, improving scalability and maintainability.

Enhanced scalability:

Load distribution : You can scale the Write Model and Read Model independently. For example, if your system needs to handle more read queries, you can scale the Read Model without affecting the Write Model.

Extensibility : CQRS allows you to easily scale your system by adding more command or query handlers without degrading the performance of other parts.

Improved maintainability and development:

Separation of concerns : Separating code related to write and read operations makes the code easier to manage and maintain. Changes or upgrades to one part of the system will not affect the rest.

Flexible design : You can design independent data models and processing mechanisms for writes and reads, making it easier to develop new features or change existing ones.

With CQRS, you can track and analyze write and read data operations separately, making it easier to detect and resolve issues.

3.2 Disadvantages of CQRS

Complexity Management: CQRS increases system complexity by requiring a clear separation between write and read operations. This can lead to managing more components and handling issues such as data synchronization.

Data Synchronization Management: When data is changed in the Write Model, the Read Model needs to be updated to reflect those changes. This may require complex synchronization mechanisms and can lead to latency in updating read data.

Costs: Implementing CQRS can require a significant investment in system design and development. These costs include designing different data models, building command and query handlers, and maintaining synchronization mechanisms.

Latency: Since the Read Model is not always immediately synchronized with the Write Model, there may be latency in reading new or updated data. This can impact eventual consistency in systems that require high accuracy.

System Size: In small or simple systems, implementing CQRS may not provide clear benefits and can introduce unnecessary complexity. In these cases, adopting CQRS may be overkill and can create undue complexity.

4. Conclusion

CQRS enhances system performance, scalability, and maintainability by separating writes and reads. Yet, it demands more complex management and investment. Its suitability depends on a careful evaluation of your project's specific needs.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .