Optimizing String Comparisons in Go

Jeremy Morgan - Sep 11 '20 - - Dev Community

Want your Go programs to run faster? Optimizing string comparisons can improve your application's response time and help scalability. Comparing two strings to see if they're equal takes processing power, but not all comparisons are the same. In a previous article, we looked at How to compare strings in Go and did some benchmarking. We're going to expand on that here.

It may seem like a small thing, but as all great optimizers know, it's the little things that add up. Let's dig in.

Measuring Case Sensitive Compares

First, let's measure two types of string comparisons.

Method 1: Using Comparison Operators 

if a == b {
  return true
}else {
  return false
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Method 2: Using Strings.Compare 

if strings.Compare(a, b) == 0 {
  return true
}
return false
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

So we know the first method is a bit easier. We don't need to bring in any packages from the standard library, and it's a bit less code. Fair enough, but which one is faster? Let's find out.

Initially, we're going to set up a single app with a test file. We're going to use the Benchmarking utility from the Go test tools.

compare.go 

package main

import (
    "strings"
)

func main() {
}

// operator compare
func compareOperators(a string, b string) bool {
  if a == b {
       return true
    }else {
       return false
    }
}

// strings compare
func compareString(a string, b string) bool {
  if strings.Compare(a, b) == 0 {
       return true
    }
    return false
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

And we'll create a set of tests for it:

compare_test.go 

package main

import (
    "testing"
)

func BenchmarkCompareOperators(b *testing.B) {
    for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
        compareOperators("This is a string", "This is a strinG")
    }
}

func BenchmarkCompareString(b *testing.B) {
    for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
        compareString("This is a string", "This is a strinG")
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

For the string samples, I will change the last character to make sure the methods parse the entire string.

Some Notes if you've never done this:

  • We are using the Go testing package
  • By naming it compare_test.go Go knows to look for tests here.
  • Instead of tests, we insert benchmarks. Each func must be preceded by Benchmark
  • We will run our tests with bench flag

To run our benchmarks, use this command:

go test -bench=.
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Here are my results:

Optimizing String Compare in Go

So using standard comparison operators is faster than using the method from the Strings package. 7.39 nanoseconds vs. 2.92.

Running the test several times shows similar results:

Optimizing String Compare in Go

So, it's clearly faster. 5ms can make a big difference at a large enough scale.

Verdict: Basic string comparison is faster than strings package comparison for case sensitive string compares.

Measuring Case Insensitive Compares

Let's change it up. Generally, when I'm doing a string compare, I want to see if the test in the string matches, no matter which characters are capitalized. This adds some complexity to our operation.

sampleString := "This is a sample string"
compareString := "this is a sample string"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

With a standard compare, these two strings are not equal because the T is capitalized.

However, we are now looking for the text, and don't care how it's capitalized. So let's change our functions to reflect this:

// operator compare
func compareOperators(a string, b string) bool {
    if strings.ToLower(a) == strings.ToLower(b) {
        return true
    }
    return false
}

// strings compare
func compareString(a string, b string) bool {
    if strings.Compare(strings.ToLower(a), strings.ToLower(b)) == 0 {
        return true
    }
    return false
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now before each comparison, we make both strings lowercase. We're adding in some extra cycles to be sure. Let's benchmark them.

Optimizing String Compare in Go

They appear to be the same. I run it a few times to be sure:

Optimizing String Compare in Go

Yep, they're the same. But why?

One reason is, we've added the Strings.ToLower action to every execution. This is a performance hit. Remember strings are simple runes, and the ToLower() method loops through the rune, making every character lowercase, then performs a comparison. This extra time washes out any big differences between the actions.

Introducing EqualFold

In our last article, we looked at EqualFold as another way of doing case insensitive compares. We determined Equalfold was the fastest of the three methods. Let's see if this set of benchmark reflects that.

Add this to compare.go

// EqualFold compare
func compareEF(a string, b string) bool {
    if strings.EqualFold(sampleString, compareString) {
        return true
    }else {
        return false
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

And add the following test to compare_test.go

func BenchmarkEqualFold(b *testing.B) {
    for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
        compareEF("This is a string", "This is a strinG")
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

So lets now run a benchmark on these three methods:

Optimizing String Compare in Go

Wow! EqualFold is considerably faster. I run it several times with the same results.

Why is it faster? BecauseEqualfold also parses the rune character by character, but it "drops off early" when it finds a different character.

Verdict: EqualFold (Strings Package) comparison is faster for case sensitive string compares.

Let's Ramp Up Our testing

Ok, so we know these benchmarks show significant differences between the methods. Let's add in some more complexity, shall we?

In the last article, we added in this 200,000 line word list to make comparisons. We'll change our methods to open up this file and run string comparisons till we find a match.

Optimizing String Compare in Go

In this file, I added the name we're searching for at the end of the file, so we know the test will loop through 199,000 words before matching.

Change your methods to look like this:

compare.go 

// operator compare
func compareOperators(a string) bool {
    file, err := os.Open("names.txt")
    result := false;

    if err != nil {
        log.Fatalf("failed opening file: %s", err)
    }

    scanner := bufio.NewScanner(file)
    scanner.Split(bufio.ScanLines)

    for scanner.Scan() {
        if strings.ToLower(a) == strings.ToLower(scanner.Text()) {
            result = true
        }else {
            result = false
        }
    }
    file.Close()
    return result
}

// strings compare
func compareString(a string) bool {
    file, err := os.Open("names.txt")
    result := false;

    if err != nil {
        log.Fatalf("failed opening file: %s", err)
    }

    scanner := bufio.NewScanner(file)
    scanner.Split(bufio.ScanLines)

    for scanner.Scan() {
        if strings.Compare(strings.ToLower(a), strings.ToLower(scanner.Text())) == 0  {
            result = true
        }else {
            result = false
        }
    }
    file.Close()
    return result
}

// EqualFold compare
func compareEF(a string) bool {
    file, err := os.Open("names.txt")
    result := false;

    if err != nil {
        log.Fatalf("failed opening file: %s", err)
    }

    scanner := bufio.NewScanner(file)
    scanner.Split(bufio.ScanLines)

    for scanner.Scan() {
        if strings.EqualFold(a, scanner.Text()) {
            result = true
        }else {
            result = false
        }
    }
    file.Close()
    return result
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Yes, each of these are now going to:

  • Open a text file
  • Parse it line by line
  • Look for the search phrase

Let's change our tests now, so the funcs only take one parameter:

compare_test.go 


func BenchmarkCompareOperators(b *testing.B) {
    for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
        compareOperators("Immanuel1234")
    }
}

func BenchmarkCompareString(b *testing.B) {
    for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
        compareString("Immanuel1234")
    }
}

func BenchmarkEqualFold(b *testing.B) {
    for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
        compareEF("Immanuel1234")
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

So now, we can expect the test to take longer, so there will be fewer iterations from the benchmarking tool. Let's run it:

Optimizing String Compare in Go

And EqualFold still comes out on top, by quite a bit.

Adding to the complexity of this test is good and bad.

Good: Reading in text and doing sequential tests is more "real life" simulation
Good: We can force more diverse testing with different strings
Bad: We introduce several factors (file reading, etc.) that could skew our results.

Verdict: EqualFold (Strings Package) comparison is STILL faster for case sensitive string compares.

But Wait, There's More!!

Is there any way we can make this compare even faster? Of course. I decided to try counting the characters of the string. If the character count is different, it's not the same string, so we can "duck out early" on the comparison altogether.

But we still need to include EqualFold in case the strings are equal length but different characters. The added check of the count makes the operation more expensive, so would it be faster? Let's find out.

compare.go 

func compareByCount(a string) bool {
    file, err := os.Open("names.txt")
    result := false;

    if err != nil {
        log.Fatalf("failed opening file: %s", err)
    }

    scanner := bufio.NewScanner(file)
    scanner.Split(bufio.ScanLines)

    for scanner.Scan() {
        if len(a) == len(scanner.Text()) &&  strings.EqualFold(a, scanner.Text()){
            result = true
        }else {
            result = false
        }
    }
    file.Close()
    return result
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

compare_test.go 

func BenchmarkCompareByCount(b *testing.B){
    for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
        compareByCount("Immanuel1234")
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Optimizing String Compare in Go

And it is indeed faster! Every little bit counts.

Verdict: Do a character count with your EqualFold comparison for even more speed

Summary

In this article, we looked at a few different string comparison methods and which one is faster. Bottom line: Use a basic comparison for case sensitive comparisons, and character count + EqualFold for case insensitive comparisons.

I love doing tests like this, and you'll find small changes add up pretty nice when you're doing optimization. Stay tuned for more articles where we look at optimizations like this.

What do you think? Let me know!

Image
Cisza w Mieszkaniu: Jak Wyciszyć Swoją Przestrzeń i Osiągnąć Spokój
Image
From Zero to Hero: Dockerizing My Go App and Hosting It on Render like a Pro 🚀

tutorial, go, learning, docker
Image
DIGITAL RESOLUTION SERVICES\\CRYPTO RESCUE EXPERTS.
Image
persyaratan situs slots online yang simpel ditaklukkan
Image
Metode Menunjuk Situs Judi Online Sesuai sama Games yang Dijajakan
Image
Free VPS Hosting and Windows VPS to Understand How They Work on Websites

server, vps, windows, linux
Image
Jak Wyciszyć Mieszkanie: Praktyczne Porady na Spokojne Chwile
Image
Situs Judi Online Pelayanan 24 Jam Full dan Terunggul
Image
Dance For Fitness, Grace, Beauty And Poise
Image
Everyday Beauty Solutions For Common Skin Problems
Image
https://my-developer-portfolio.pages.dev/
Image
Panduan Jadi Raja Judi Online yang Sukses
Image
metode aman di permainan slots online indonesia
Image
unblock
Image
Automated Testing Made Simple: Setting Up and Exploring pytest
Image
Volledig elektrische warmtepomp: van gas naar stroom
Image
My First JavaScript Web App: Interactive Image Coordinate Finder

webdev, javascript, beginners, learning
Image
Panduan Teknik Main Judi Online Dengan Pc (Pemula)
Image
Great Tips For Maintaining Happy, Healthy Hair
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .