Day 20 of 30-Day .NET Challenge: Task vs. ValueTask

Sukhpinder Singh - Apr 8 - - Dev Community

Heap allocations aren’t entirely bad but when an object is allocated on a heap it contributes to the garbage collection cycles which in turn reduces overall application performance.

Introduction

One approach to optimize resource usage in async code is by using ValueTask syntax to minimize heap allocations, which in turn reduces pressure on garbage collection and enhances overall performance.

Learning Objectives

  • The Problem with Heap Allocations

  • Optimizing with ValueTask

  • When to Use ValueTask

Prerequisites for Developers

  • Basic understanding of C# programming language.

Getting Started

Heap allocations aren’t entirely bad but when an object is allocated on a heap it contributes to the garbage collection cycles which in turn reduces overall application performance. In case of excessive heap allocation, the garbage collector can lead to GC pauses.

Bad Practice: Excessive Use of Task

Let’s consider a common asynchronous pattern that developers commonly use:

    public async Task<string> ReadDataAsync()
    {
        var data = await ReadFromStreamAsync(_stream);
        return ProcessData(data);
    }
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If the above-mentioned method is called more frequently, each request results in a new Task instance being allocated on heap memory. Over time, it leads to increased garbage collection overhead.

Optimizing with ValueTask

By changing the return type from Task to ValueTask, we can reduce heap allocations

    public async ValueTask<string> ReadDataAsync()
    {
        var data = await ReadFromStreamAsync(_stream);
        return ProcessData(data);
    }
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The aforementioned optimization is beneficial for high-frequency async operations or methods which are expected to complete synchronously in a significant portion of time.

When to Use ValueTask

  • High-frequency methods

  • Performance-sensitive code

  • Methods that often complete synchronously

Create another class named TaskVsValueTask and add the following code snippet

    public static class TaskVsValueTask
    {
        public static async Task<string> FetchDataAsync()
        {
            // Simulate a delay to mimic fetching data
            await Task.Delay(1000);
            return "Data fetched using Task";
        }

        public static async ValueTask<string> FetchDataValueTaskAsync()
        {
            // Simulate a delay to mimic fetching data
            await Task.Delay(1000); // Note: Use Task.Delay for the sake of example.
            return "Data fetched using ValueTask";
        }
    }
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Execute from the main method as follows

    #region Day 20: Task vs. Value Task
    static async Task<string> ExecuteDay20()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Fetching data with Task...");
        string result = await TaskVsValueTask.FetchDataAsync();
        Console.WriteLine(result);

        Console.WriteLine("Fetching data with ValueTask...");
        string resultValueTask = await TaskVsValueTask.FetchDataValueTaskAsync();
        Console.WriteLine(resultValueTask);

        return "Executed Day 20 successfully..!!";
    }
    #endregion
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Console Output

    Fetching data with Task...
    Data fetched using Task
    Fetching data with ValueTask...
    Data fetched using ValueTask
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Complete Code on GitHub

GitHub — ssukhpinder/30DayChallenge.Net

C# Programming🚀

Thank you for being a part of the C# community! Before you leave:

Follow us: Youtube | X | LinkedIn | Dev.to
Visit our other platforms: GitHub
More content at C# Programming

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .