Will React Hooks Replace React Router?

Suresh Mohan - Jun 23 '22 - - Dev Community

Routing is a necessity when it comes to single-page applications. Developers use various routing libraries to implement routing for their apps. For React, React Router is the go-to library to handle routing, and there is a massive community around it.

However, with the emergence of React Hooks as an alternative solution, the Hookrouter was introduced as a flexible, fast router based on Hooks.

In this article, let’s discuss whether there is a possibility of replacing React Router while leveraging the power of hooks with Hookrouter.

Defining Routes

Assume that you are developing a React app with three pages. The conventional way of implementing routing with React Router is as follows.

import Nav from './components/Nav';
import Home from './components/Home';
import Users from './components/Users';
import Profile from './components/Profile';
import {BrowserRouter as Router,Route} from'react-router-dom'; 

function App() { 
  return ( 
      <Router> 
        <div className="App"><Nav/> 
          <Route path = '/' component = {Home}/> 
          <Route path = '/users' component = {Users}/> 
          <Route path = '/profile' component = {Profile}/></div> 
      </Router> 
  );
}

export default App;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Defining routes with Hookrouter is pretty straightforward. You just have to define routes as a plain JavaScript object. The useRoutes() Hook in the Hookrouter module analyzes and returns a result for a predefined routes object. We have to define routes as keys in the routes object, and their values as functions that are triggered when the routes match.

import {useRoutes} from 'hookrouter';
import Nav from './components/Nav';
import Home from './components/Home';
import Users from './components/Users';
import Profile from './components/Profile';

function App() { 
   const routes = { 
     '/' :()=><Home/>, 
     '/users' :()=> <Users/>, 
     '/profile' :()=> <Profile/>, 
};
const routeResults = useRoutes(routes); 
return ( 
     <div className="App"> 
    <Nav/> 
    {routeResults} 
     </div> 
);
} 

export default App;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Routing with useRoutes() seems appealing since there isn’t much to do for us. For each route in the app, we have to render the component when using React Router. But with Hookrouter, we can simply use the defined routes in our app by sending them to the useRoutes() Hook.

Hookrouter produces the same outcome as the React Router but in a more streamlined and lightweight manner.

Navigation

React Router offers the component to configure route navigations and handle interactive routing.

import React from 'react';
import {Link} from 'react-router-dom';

function Nav() { 
return ( 
   <div> 
       <nav>
      <ul className='nav-links'> 
          <Link className='Link' to='/'> 
           <li>HOME</li> </Link> 
          <Link className='Link' to='/users'> 
           <li>USERS</li> </Link> 
          <Link className='Link' to='/profile'> 
           <li>PROFILE</li> </Link>
          </ul> 
       </nav> 
   </div> 
);
}

export default Nav;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

To facilitate navigation, the Hookrouter module wraps the HTML anchor tag as .

import React from 'react';
import {A} from 'hookrouter'; 

function Nav() { 
   return ( 
    <div> 
       <nav> 
         <ul className='nav-links'> 
        <A className='Link' href='/'>
           <li>HOME</li> 
        </A> 
        <A className='Link' href='/users'> 
           <li>USERS</li> 
        </A> 
        <A className='Link' href='/profile'> 
           <li>PROFILE</li> 
        </A> 
          </ul> 
       </nav> 
    </div> 
   ) ;
} 

export default Nav;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Hookrouter is available as a React component and is completely feature-equivalent to the inherent tag. The only difference is that instead of loading a new page, Hookrouter moves navigations to the history stack.

In React apps, Hookrouter allows us to configure route navigations and handle interactive routing by rendering the routes on-screen and navigating to them when clicked.

Hookrouter provides programmatic navigation functionality with the navigate() Hook. We can apply the navigate() Hook to the direct users to a particular page defined by a given absolute or relative URL. Use the following example to navigate to a home page.

navigate('/home');
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

As every call to the navigate() function is forward navigation, users can use the back button on their browser to return to the previous URL. The navigation() Hook accepts three parameters: navigate(url, [replace], [queryParams]). We can use the second of these to replace the back button behavior. It deletes the existing history entry and creates a new one in its stead. To do this, simply set its argument to true.

navigate('/home', true);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Switch Functionality

When the predefined navigation routes are not matched, React Router renders a default page using the component.

It helps us to render a 404 page to inform the user that the requested route isn’t available in the app. To achieve this, we encapsulate all rendered routes within the component and render the 404 page without specifying a path prop.

import Nav from './components/Nav';
import Home from './components/Home';
import Users from './components/Users';
import Profile from './components/Profile';
import Error from './components/Error';
import {BrowserRouter as Router, Switch,Route} from'react-router-dom'; 

function App() { 
return ( 
   <Router>
      <div className="App">
    <Nav/>
      <Switch> 
        <Route path = '/' exact component = {Home}/> 
        <Route path = '/users' component = {Users}/> 
        <Route path = '/profile'exact component = {Profile}/>
        <Route><Error/></Route> 
      </Switch>
      </div> 
   </Router> 
);
}

export default App;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

It’s effortless to conditionally render routes with Hookrouter since we create a routes object that comprises all of our route paths. You have to pass that object into the useRoutes() Hook. When a defined route is not matched, just pass the 404 error file for rendering, along with the result function.

import {useRoutes} from 'hookrouter';
import Home from './components/Home';
import Users from './components/Users';
import Profile from './components/Profile';
import Error from './components/Error'; 

function App() { 
  const routes = { 
    '/' :()=><Home/>, 
    '/users' :()=> <Users/>, 
    '/profile' :()=> <Profile/>, 
  }; 

  const routeResults = useRoutes(routes); 
  return ( 
    <div className="App"> 
    <Nav/> 
    {routeResults||<Error/>} 
    </div> 
  );
} 

export default App;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

One thing I’ve discovered with the React Router is that if we didn’t declare the exact path, it will result in inaccurate routings in some instances.

As an example, if we didn’t mention the path to home as exact, the app will not route to any other path that begins with ‘/’. As a consequence, the app will never navigate to the Users or Profile pages, and instead keep falling back to the home page.

Hookrouter, on the other hand, does not require explicit definitions of exact paths since the routes are declared as an object.

Redirects

When users wish to dynamically redirect from one route to another, we need redirection. We can perform this with React Router using a few methods, such as using the history object or the component.

For example, if we have a login form, we can use the browser history object to redirect logged-in users to the ‘/home’ route.

import React from 'react';

class Login extends React.Component { 
loginUser = () => { 
// if (user is logged in successfully) 
      this.props.history.push('/home') 
} 
 render() { 
   return ( 
      <form>
    <input type="name" />
    <input type="email" /> 
    <button onClick={this.loginUser}>Login</button> 
      </form> 
   ) ;
 }
}

export default Login;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Hookrouter handles redirects with the simple useRedirect() Hook, which takes the source route and target route as parameters.

import {useRoutes, useRedirect} from 'hookrouter';
import Home from "./components/Home"; 

const routes = { 
   '/login': () => <Login />, 
   '/home': () => <Home />
};

const Users = () => {
   useRedirect('/login', '/home'); 
   const routeResult = useRoutes(routes); 
   return routeResult;
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Since a replacement navigation intent is triggered by this Hook, the navigation history will only have one entry. As a result, if the ‘/login’ route is redirected to ‘/home,’ as indicated in the last code snippet, the ‘/login’ route will be removed from the browser history.

Final Thoughts

React Router is undoubtedly a fantastic tool. But, for some projects, React Router may be excessive if you only need simple navigation and routing functionality.

On the other hand, React Router has a lot of navigational components that you can use to structure your app declaratively, which may be quite beneficial for broader and more sophisticated navigational requirements in React apps.

However, with the launch of Hooks, a lot has happened in React. So, when handling routes in smaller apps, the Hooks-based approach provides a more flexible and clean solution.

Currently, I don’t see a possibility that Hooks will replace React Router. But, with time, if it continues to evolve with rich functionality, it might have the potential to take over.

I hope you found this useful. Thank you for reading.

The Syncfusion React suite offers over 70 high-performance, lightweight, modular, and responsive UI components in a single package. It’s the only suite you’ll ever need to construct a complete application.

If you have questions, you can contact us through our support forum, support portal, or feedback portal. We are always happy to assist you!

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .