6 Reasons Regression Testing Should Be Automated

Rohit Bhandari - Sep 4 '23 - - Dev Community

Image description
The importance of guaranteeing software product quality cannot be overstated in the fast-paced world of software development today. Regression testing is an essential phase in this process since it helps to confirm that previously designed and tested software still functions as intended after updates or adjustments. Although regression testing is crucial, it may also be time- and money-consuming. However, organizations may now streamline their testing processes and increase productivity thanks to the development of automated regression testing. The significance, advantages, and potential impact of automated regression testing on the testing environment for businesses will all be covered in this blog post.

What is Regression Testing?

Regression testing is a kind of software testing that checks to see if a software system’s current functionalities are still in place after upgrades, changes, or bug patches. Retesting particular software components is necessary to make sure that no new flaws have been introduced. This procedure is essential because even little changes may unintentionally affect other system components. Organizations can reduce risks and ensure the general stability and dependability of their software by undertaking thorough regression testing.

Why Should Regression Testing Be Automated?

Enhanced Efficiency: By carrying out test cases quickly and accurately, automation greatly accelerates the regression testing process. With the aid of automation tools, routine activities may be completed quickly, giving testers more time to concentrate on complicated cases. As a result, productivity is increased and the software development life cycle is accelerated.

Cost Savings: Manual regression testing can be a time- and resource-consuming process that demands a lot from testers with expertise. Organizations can reduce their reliance on human resources by automating repetitive test cases, which will result in significant long-term cost reductions.

Additional Test Coverage: A wider test coverage is possible with automated regression testing, guaranteeing that all crucial functionality is carefully checked. Organizations can find potential flaws and vulnerabilities that manual testing would have overlooked by swiftly executing a large number of test cases.
Increased Accuracy and Consistency: Since human error is unavoidable, manual regression testing is prone to errors brought on by fatigue or oversight. Automation gets rid of these mistakes by carrying out tests precisely and repeatedly, producing more dependable results.

Time Optimization: Even in agile or DevOps environments, enterprise test automation enables organizations to test often and iteratively. This quick feedback loop makes sure that any problems or errors are found early in the development cycle and fixed, saving time and resources.

Scalability: The regression testing procedure scales with the growth and complexity of software systems. Regression testing that is automated may readily scale up to handle the growing number of test cases, assuring thorough coverage and upholding the required standard of quality.

Conclusion

Businesses looking to improve the effectiveness and quality of their software products will find that automated regression testing is a game-changer. Regression testing procedures can be streamlined with Opkey, a top-tier business test automation platform. Opkey’s State of ERP Testing report shows that companies that used Opkey saw a 40% decrease in testing efforts and a 30% increase in test coverage, underscoring the software’s success in regression testing.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .