Why is Automation Testing Gaining Popularity Over Manual Testing?

Rohit Bhandari - Sep 7 '23 - - Dev Community

Image description
In the present-day situation, the success of any organization heavily relies on software development. As the demand for the best software rises, the need for efficient and dependable testing has grown exponentially. While manual testing has been the go-to method since long, it has certain limitations. Consequently, automation testing has emerged as an increasingly favored and effective alternative.

Automation testing entails the utilization of specialized tools and software to execute test cases and compare actual outcomes with expected ones. This helps to save time and effort and also provide precise and reliable results.

Here, we will analyze automated testing vs manual testing and how automation testing is better.

Why is Automation Testing Gaining Popularity Over Manual Testing

Reduced Human Error

One of the most notable merits of automation testing over manual testing lies in the reduction of human error. Manual testing is susceptible to mistakes due to its repetitive nature, which can bore and tire testers. This may result in a lack of attention to detail and the possibility of overlooking critical defects.

Conversely, automation testing mitigates the risk of human error by accurately and consistently executing test cases. Automated test scripts can be created to repetitively perform the same tests, ensuring comprehensive examination of the software's functionalities.

Integration with Continuous Integration/Delivery (CI/CD) Pipelines

Another significant benefit of automation testing is its compatibility with Continuous Integration/Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines. CI/CD involves the continuous integration and delivery of code changes to production, employing automated tools and processes to facilitate automatic building, testing, and deployment of code changes.

Integrating automation testing into the CI/CD pipeline allows code changes to be automatically tested before being deployed to production.

Industry-wide Adoption

Automation testing has gained substantial popularity and is now an industry-wide standard. Organizations across various sectors have embraced automation testing, recognizing the benefits it offers. Automation testing is no longer considered a luxury but a necessity in software development.

The widespread acceptance of automation testing has spurred the development of numerous automation testing tools and frameworks. These tools and frameworks are designed to enhance accessibility and ease of implementation for automation testing.

Increased Test Coverage

Automation testing excels in providing extensive test coverage by rapidly and accurately executing numerous test cases. Manual testing, on the other hand, can be time-consuming and may fall short in encompassing all software functionalities.

Automated testing can also facilitate regression testing, ensuring that modifications to the software do not disrupt existing functionality. Automated tests can simulate diverse scenarios, validating the software's performance under various conditions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is evident why test automation is gaining immense popularity over manual testing in the realm of software development. Automation testing overcomes the limitations of manual testing, including human error and restricted test coverage.

With automation testing becoming an industry-wide standard, it is crucial for businesses to adopt this approach to remain competitive. Opkey, the leading solution for enterprise test automation, empowers you to seamlessly integrate your end-to-end business processes across a wide range of technologies and enterprise applications.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .