Unveiling Best Practices for Testing Oracle Cloud Financials 24A Release

Rohit Bhandari - Aug 6 - - Dev Community

Image description
The release of Oracle Cloud Financials 24A shows a progression in the capacity for managing finance for businesses. However, it is crucial to have thorough testing practices that guarantee smooth transition and functioning. In this blog, we explore the most effective methods to test Oracle Financials 24A Release by discussing scope definition, sanity test implementation, automation and use of impact analysis reports.

Defining the scope of testing

The initial stage of testing Oracle Cloud Financials 24A is to determine what will be tested. This means recognizing the important functions, modules and connections that are affected by the update. It's crucial to arrange tests according to their influence on business procedures, adherence demands and customer satisfaction. By doing so, resources can be allocated efficiently, and testing efforts can be streamlined.

Necessary tests vs. unnecessary tests

All tests are not the same, especially when there is a quarterly update. It is essential to do regression testing to make sure old functions stay good but every feature may not need complete testing. Give importance to tests that include main financial steps, like making invoices, matching accounts and preparing reports. Places not affected by changes or only having small improvements might not require thorough testing, so resources can concentrate on crucial zones.

Implementing sanity tests

It is important to carry out sanity tests for the sake of business continuity. These tests concentrate on fundamental functions and crucial work processes, ensuring that the system remains stable after updating it. Running sanity tests swiftly aids in identifying any major problems or disturbances at an early stage, reducing the duration of system unavailability and potential effects on business activities. Examples of sanity tests include login functionality, basic data entry, and essential report generation.

Automation vs. manual testing

Even if automation is good for tasks that are repetitive and take a lot of time, some financial processes might still need manual testing. The team should decide which processes can be automated well like data validation, regression testing or interface testing. On the other hand, complicated situations or fresh characteristics might require manual checking to ensure complete validation. To make sure all possible situations are checked, it is good to have a combination of automated and manual testing.

Utilizing impact analysis reports

The reports for impact analysis are important to see the changes between releases. These show alterations in functionalities, configurations and integrations which help in deciding where to focus testing efforts. With the help of impact analysis reports, organizations can concentrate their testing on areas that will be most affected by the update. This lessens unnecessary testing workload and guarantees an easy changeover.

Conclusion

The Oracle Cloud Financials 24A Release, especially its verification within a two-week window, may seem intimidating. But if teams follow best practices in testing, the business processes can be untouched by updates. A thoughtful method that includes clear testing areas, organized priority of tests, quick sanity checks along an equilibrium between automation and manual testing plus the efficient utilization of impact analysis reports are crucial.

If businesses want to make this activity more efficient, Opkey, an authorized Oracle partner, provides an important answer. For managing and checking updates in Oracle Cloud every quarter, Opkey's managed certification becomes helpful for reducing testing time from many weeks down to only some days. With the help of a pre-built accelerator library, advisory documents and impact analysis reports provided by the Opkey toolset - it is possible that the financial systems stay strong and obey after every update process.

Opkey can help the team in dealing with the complexities of testing Oracle Cloud Financials 24A Release. It simplifies and makes the process more efficient, ensuring a focus on strategic tasks while maintaining business continuity.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .