Understanding When User Acceptance Testing Should Be Executed

Rohit Bhandari - Aug 9 - - Dev Community

Image description
User Acceptance Testing (UAT) is a very important stage in the development of software because it checks if a product meets the hopes and needs of its ultimate users. This post will talk about the best moment to use the UAT testing tool and what things can change this decision.

Importance of User Acceptance Testing

Before we discuss when to do UAT, it is important to understand why it is necessary when making software. UAT is the final check before releasing the product for customers who will use it. This allows people working to make sure the software runs well, is simple to use, and fits what the company needs. When organizations involve the final users in their test steps, they can find and solve any issues or differences. This makes sure that users are satisfied with the product and there is a lesser chance of mistakes after it has been put out.

Early integration into the development cycle

Ideally, UAT should be part of the development cycle from the beginning. If people at the end use are included in this stage, organizations can get important feedback and deep understanding that guide the making process. Doing UAT in the early stages lets people who care about the project check the first designs and models to confirm they are what users want. Also, it reduces the chance of needing to make big changes afterwards. Moreover, it assists in making the first connection of teamwork between developers and users. This encourages honesty and belief throughout the project’s path.

Completion of functional testing

Starting integration at the very beginning is good, but UAT should happen only when functional testing has been completed. Functional testing involves checking each part or work of software and verifying if it performs as intended. After checking if it works well and fixing all problems found, we make the software ready for User Acceptance Testing (UAT). When the software is steady for UAT, there is less chance of finding big problems during testing and checking everything works better.

Alignment with project milestones

Moreover, the timing for User Acceptance Testing (UAT) should match with major steps in project growth, like finishing up the development phases or starting key features. When UAT matches these steps, companies can better monitor the software’s progress step by step and quickly solve any problems. For people who have a part in making decisions, it assists them in choosing to launch the product on time by examining test results and feedback from users during this particular phase called UAT.

Conclusion

In ending, it is important to do User Acceptance Testing (UAT) at the proper time to sure that software projects win. If UAT joins the making process of software from the start, companies can make use of what end users say to make their products better and make their customers. However, it may be hard to set up User Acceptance Testing (UAT) that needs detailed plans and organizing among those involved.

This is the place where Opkey becomes a game-changer in the UAT scene. The No-Code testing platform of Opkey permits any workers, no matter their technical background, to make automated tests easily, reducing the burden on technical groups and improving UAT efficiency. Companies may use Test Discovery from Opkey to discover specific important processes that need testing and to widen the scope of testing.

Opkey possesses strong reporting and examining features that offer a detailed look at the testing results. This helps in cooperation and decision-making by the members of the project team. Opkey gives out automatically made reports that are simple to understand, which helps organizations see problems early and make their software better – this helps them reach their business goals.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .