Unlocking 5 Benefits of Automated Testing

Rohit Bhandari - Oct 7 - - Dev Community

Image description
Automated testing has become crucial for software teams to deliver high quality applications faster and more efficiently. When testing is manual, it becomes extremely tedious and time-consuming for human testers to cover the myriad of test scenarios needed to fully validate software functionality and reliability. Test automation is a solution to this problem. By writing scripts and code to simulate user interactions and workflows, automated testing allows for exponentially greater test coverage and frees up human tester time considerably. There are some benefits of automated testing that development teams get.

Reduced Testing Time

One of the biggest advantages of test automation is the sizable time savings it delivers over manual testing methods. Studies show that test automation typically cuts testing efforts by 40% to 80%. The reason is that automated test scripts can simulate user workflows far faster than humanly possible. Once created, these automated tests can then be reused on different versions of the application as new features get added or bugs fixed. The reuse further maximizes time savings over having to manually test each new iteration.

Enhanced Test Coverage

Very high-test coverage is essential for releasing high quality, bug free software that provides a positive user experience. The drawback with manual testing is that it’s extremely challenging for testers to simulate the wide range of workflows and use cases required to adequately test an entire application or system. There are practical limits on what staffing bandwidth can realistically cover through manual means alone.

Consistency & Reliability

One risk with manual testing is inconsistency in results. Outcomes can vary based on who the tester is, what day the test is performed, or other variables like system conditions etc. Test automation eliminates this variability by executing precisely the same steps the exact same way every time. This leads to more uniform test scenarios and conditions applied consistently across testing cycles.

Increased Scalability

As development teams and projects grow over time and systems increase in complexity, relying solely on manual test execution faces natural bottleneck limitations in scaling up. There are finite limits to how many additional human testers can realistically be added to expand testing capacity. Hiring and onboarding new testing staff also takes considerable time and training.

Facilitates Continuous Testing

Modern software practices like continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) require very frequent code changes and rapid iterations. There are too many code check-ins, build verifications, and incremental updates happening around the clock for traditional periodic testing to remain relevant and value-added. This is why continuous testing powered by test automation has become essential.

Conclusion

Opkey is one of the leading ERP testing tools that enable no-code automated testing from day one. It seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for continuous testing. Unlike other tools requiring setup time, Opkey allows immediate implementation reducing manual effort. It supports automated regression, API, unit, and integration testing. Opkey’s AI recommends test cases and heals broken scripts, significantly improving coverage. It mines test data and master details from clients’ environments, reducing data collection efforts by 40%. Opkey supports 14+ ERPS and 150+ technologies, providing end-to-end risk coverage with 30,000+ automated tests so you don’t have to build from scratch. Opkey is globally recognized as facilitating efficient automated testing.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .