Vercel vs Netlify vs GitHub Pages

Sh Raj - Feb 5 - - Dev Community

Vercel

  • Optimized for Next.js sites and serverless functions
  • Instant deployments from GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket
  • Unlimited bandwidth and storage for hobby projects
  • Free SSL encryption
  • Edge Network delivers sites and apps globally
  • Integrates with headless CMSs like Contentful and Ghost
  • Easy to add authentication provider
  • Has free hobby tier and paid pro plans
  • Limitations:
    • 50 GB bandwidth per month for free accounts
    • No custom plugins or modules

Netlify

  • Continuous deployment from Git providers
  • Integrates with many headless CMSs like Contentful and Ghost
  • Flexible build settings and branch deploy controls
  • Global CDN, free SSL, DDoS protection
  • Can use Netlify Functions for serverless backend
  • Open source Netlify Dev for local development
  • 100 GB data transfer and 300 build minutes per month on free tier
  • Limitations:
    • Must upgrade for custom redirects
    • No SSH or database access on free plan

GitHub Pages

  • Host sites directly from GitHub repositories
  • Easy workflow using Git and GitHub for pushing changes
  • Supports Jekyll static site generator
  • Integrates seamlessly with GitHub Actions workflows
  • No strict limits on bandwidth or storage
  • Free custom domains on GitHub's IP address
  • Limitations:
    • Sites must be purely static - no server-side code
    • No database or advanced CMS support
    • Slow build times compared to Vercel and Netlify

Comparison

Vercel Netlify GitHub Pages
Optimized for Next.js apps Static sites Static sites
Deploys from Git providers Git providers GitHub only
Build Times Very fast Fast Slow
Bandwidth Limits 50GB (free) 100GB (free) None
Custom Domains Free Paid only Free on GitHub IP
Serverless Functions Yes Netlify Functions No
CMS Integrations Contentful, Ghost Contentful, Ghost, more Through static site generators
Pricing Free - $19/month Free - $45/month Free

In summary, Vercel is best for Next.js apps, Netlify is the most flexible, and GitHub Pages is simplest overall. Consider bandwidth needs and desired features when choosing.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .